Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Validation of an instrument for perceived factors affecting fruit and vegetable intake based on Pender's health promotion model

Freshteh Khatti-Dizabadi; Jamshid Yazdani-Charati; Reza Amani; Firoozeh Mostafavi

Journal of Nutritional Science · 2022

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This cross-sectional validation study developed and tested a 104-item instrument measuring perceived behavioural factors affecting fruit and vegetable consumption in a sample of Iranian government employees. The instrument, grounded in Pender's health promotion model, demonstrated strong psychometric properties across face validity, content validity, and internal consistency measures. The 15-factor structure and robust validity indices suggest the instrument is suitable for use in future research on dietary behaviour change.

Regional applicability

This Iranian study's findings are not directly generalisable to United Kingdom populations, given differences in cultural context, food environments, and health promotion frameworks. However, the methodological approach to instrument validation and the theoretical application of Pender's health promotion model to fruit and vegetable intake may inform UK-based research, particularly if the instrument is adapted and re-validated for British dietary and cultural contexts.

Key measures

Face validity mean impact score (96.42% of items acceptable); content validity ratio (0.92); content validity index (0.97); Cronbach's alpha reliability (0.96); cumulative variance explained (61.17%)

Outcomes reported

The study developed and validated a 104-item instrument across 15 factors measuring perceived influences on fruit and vegetable consumption behaviour based on Pender's health promotion model. Validity and reliability were assessed through face validity, content validity, construct validity and internal consistency testing.

Theme
Measurement & metrics
Subject
Food environments & consumer behaviour
Study type
Research
Study design
Instrument validation study (cross-sectional)
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Iran
System type
Food supply chain
DOI
10.1017/jns.2021.90
Catalogue ID
NRmr25bttq-000

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.