Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Mendelian randomization for nephrologists

Ellen Dobrijevic, Anita van Zwieten, Krzysztof Kiryluk, Andrew J. Grant, Germaine Wong, Armando Teixeira‐Pinto

Kidney International · 2023

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This 2023 educational review introduces nephrologists to Mendelian randomisation as a causal inference tool, explaining core MR principles and the application of different MR designs in kidney disease research. The authors address methodological considerations specific to nephrology, including potential biases and limitations of genetic epidemiological approaches. The paper appears designed to bridge advances in causal inference methodology and clinical nephrology practice, making statistical genetics methods more accessible to clinicians without extensive training in genetic epidemiology.

Regional applicability

As a methodological review focused on causal inference techniques in kidney disease research, the principles and guidance are broadly applicable across healthcare systems. The applicability to United Kingdom nephrology research and practice depends on the uptake of Mendelian randomisation methods in UK renal epidemiology and clinical research; the paper itself does not address UK-specific policy or clinical contexts.

Key measures

Not applicable — methodological review rather than empirical study

Outcomes reported

This educational review synthesises Mendelian randomisation (MR) principles and discusses the strengths, limitations, and methodological considerations of different MR designs for causal inference in kidney disease research.

Theme
Measurement & metrics
Subject
Measurement methods & nutrient profiling
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Other
DOI
10.1016/j.kint.2023.09.016
Catalogue ID
SNmp6e6xhe-8ysl7i

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.