Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Loneliness, Depressive Mood and Cyberbullying Victimization in Adolescent Victims of Cyber Dating Violence

María Jesús Cava, Inês Tomás, Sofía Buelga, Laura Carrascosa

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · 2020

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This cross-sectional study of 604 adolescents examined the prevalence and psychosocial correlates of cyber dating violence victimization. The findings demonstrate that cyber-control was more common than cyber-aggression, and that frequent CDV victimization was associated with greater cyberbullying, depressive mood, and (in girls) loneliness. The authors emphasise the close relationship between cyberbullying and CDV, suggesting attention to poly-victimization risk and sex-differentiated psychosocial adjustment outcomes.

Regional applicability

The study does not explicitly report the geographic location of the sample. Without confirmation of United Kingdom origin, transferability to UK adolescent populations should be assessed; however, the findings on cyber dating violence psychosocial effects are likely relevant to UK youth given similar technology use patterns and dating relationship dynamics in adolescent populations.

Key measures

Prevalence of CDV victimization (occasional vs. frequent; cyber-control vs. cyber-aggression); correlations with loneliness, depressive mood, and cyberbullying victimization; effect sizes by sex

Outcomes reported

The study analysed prevalence of cyber dating violence (CDV) victimization by frequency and type, and examined relationships with loneliness, depressive mood, and cyberbullying victimization in 604 adolescents (mean age 14.32 years). Cyber-control was more prevalent than cyber-aggression, with positive correlations between CDV victimization and both depressive mood and cyberbullying in both sexes; loneliness correlations observed in girls only.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Out of scope / non-food
Study type
Research
Study design
Cross-sectional observational study
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
System type
Other
DOI
10.3390/ijerph17124269
Catalogue ID
SNmqopf68x-i2dx7q

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.