Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewedConventional

A meta-analysis of the impacts of genetically modified crops

Klümper W, Qaim M

PLOS ONE · 2014

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Klümper and Qaim's 2014 meta-analysis of 147 studies spanning 1995–2014 provides a quantitative synthesis of agronomic and economic outcomes from global genetically modified crop adoption. The analysis demonstrates that GM crops have typically increased yields and reduced pesticide applications in many contexts, though effects vary substantially by crop type, trait (Bt insect resistance versus herbicide tolerance), geography, and farming practice. The findings contribute to the empirical evidence base on GM crop performance but do not directly address nutritional quality or broader environmental impacts beyond pesticide use.

Regional applicability

The findings have limited direct application to UK agriculture, which has stringent regulatory restrictions on GM crop cultivation. However, the synthesis is relevant to UK policy discussions on food security and import sourcing, particularly for feed crops and commodities sourced from GM-adopting regions.

Key measures

Yield change (%); pesticide application volume or cost; economic returns; pest resistance trait effectiveness; herbicide tolerance trait effectiveness

Outcomes reported

The meta-analysis quantified changes in crop yields, pesticide applications, and economic returns following adoption of genetically modified crops. It synthesised data across multiple crop types, traits, and geographic regions to assess variability in agronomic and economic performance.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Pesticides, contaminants & food safety
Study type
Meta-analysis
Study design
Meta-analysis
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Arable cereals
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0111629
Catalogue ID
CGmo9yrc01-bryop5

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.