Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on intimate partner violence and mental health: advancing mental health services, research, and policy

Siân Oram, Helen L. Fisher, Helen Minnis, Soraya Seedat, Sylvia Walby, Kelsey Hegarty, Khadj Rouf, Caroline Angénieux, Felicity Callard, Prabha S. Chandra, Seena Fazel, Claudı́a Garcia‐Moreno, Marion Henderson, Emma Howarth, Harriet L. MacMillan, Laura K. Murray, Sajaratulnısah Othman, Dan Robotham, Marta B. Rondón, Angela Sweeney, Danny Taggart, Louise M. Howard

The Lancet Psychiatry · 2022

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This Lancet Psychiatry Commission report synthesises evidence on the intersections between intimate partner violence and mental health, drawing on contributions from an international panel of researchers and clinicians. The authors examine how IPV affects mental health outcomes, evaluate current mental health service responses, and propose advances in clinical practice, research, and policy to better support affected individuals. The report appears designed to inform mental health practitioners and policymakers on evidence-based approaches to recognising and responding to IPV within mental health settings.

Regional applicability

The findings and recommendations are relevant to UK mental health services, particularly in light of existing Domestic Abuse Act (2021) provisions and NHS mental health commissioning. UK practitioners may reference the Commission's evidence synthesis to strengthen trauma-informed care pathways and inter-agency coordination in response to domestic abuse.

Key measures

Mental health consequences of IPV; service accessibility and quality; policy frameworks; research priorities

Outcomes reported

The Commission examined the relationship between intimate partner violence (IPV) and mental health outcomes, and reviewed evidence on mental health service provision, research gaps, and policy recommendations for addressing IPV.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Other / interdisciplinary
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Other
DOI
10.1016/s2215-0366(22)00008-6
Catalogue ID
SNmoj7nt2d-pfjz7n

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.