Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Potential Artifacts and Control Experiments in Toxicity Tests of Nanoplastic and Microplastic Particles

Elijah J. Petersen, Ana C. Barrios, Theodore B. Henry, Monique E. Johnson, Albert A. Koelmans, Antonio R. Montoro Bustos, Joanna Matheson, Matthias Roesslein, Jian Zhao, Baoshan Xing

Environmental Science & Technology · 2022

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This paper examines potential methodological artefacts in toxicity testing of nanoplastics and microplastics (NMPs) across mammalian and ecotoxicological systems. The authors propose a framework of control experiments applicable to pelagic, sediment, and soil organism studies, with the aim of reducing false positive and false negative results. The work contributes to standardisation of NMP hazard assessment methodology.

Regional applicability

The recommendations are directly applicable to UK regulatory toxicology and environmental monitoring programmes, including soil and water quality assessments under Environmental Quality Standards and the Environmental Permitting Regulations. Standardised control protocols would support UK environmental agencies in consistent risk characterisation of microplastic and nanoplastic contamination.

Key measures

Taxonomic assessment of control experiment protocols; evaluation of artefact sources in toxicity tests; false positive and false negative rates in nano- and microplastic ecotoxicity studies

Outcomes reported

The study identifies potential artefacts and recommends control experiments for toxicity testing of nanoplastics and microplastics across mammalian, pelagic, sediment, and soil organism studies. It evaluates false positive and false negative results in ecotoxicity assessments.

Theme
Measurement & metrics
Subject
Measurement methods & nutrient profiling
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Laboratory / in vitro
DOI
10.1021/acs.est.2c04929
Catalogue ID
SNmok1wbgu-7udyyj

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.