Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewedConventional

Mehlich 3 as an indicator of grain nutrient concentration for five cereals in sub-Saharan Africa

Stephan M. Haefele, Abdul‐Wahab Mossa, Dawd Gashu, Patson C. Nalivata, Martin R. Broadley, S. P. McGrath, Cathy L. Thomas

Field Crops Research · 2024

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This validation study examined Mehlich 3 (M3) as a multi-element soil test for predicting grain nutrient concentrations in five cereal crops across contrasting soils in Ethiopia and Malawi. M3 showed statistically significant correspondence with grain nutrient concentrations in teff and wheat across all nutrients tested, with stronger performance for macronutrients than micronutrients. The findings suggest M3 has potential utility for dietary improvement programmes and soil fertility assessment in sub-Saharan Africa, though micronutrient predictions were somewhat limited by low soil micronutrient concentrations in the sampled soils.

Regional applicability

The M3 method's validation for predicting grain nutrient concentrations may have limited direct application to UK arable systems, where soil testing practices and regulatory frameworks differ substantially and soils typically show higher micronutrient availability. However, the methodological approach to validating multi-element soil tests against grain quality outcomes could inform UK soil health assessment protocols.

Key measures

Soil available nutrient concentrations (M3, CaCl₂, Ca(NO₃)₂, Olsen P, sequential extraction, DTPA); grain macro- and micronutrient concentrations (P, K, Mg, Mn, Fe, Zn, S); soil pH and properties across 1096 paired soil-crop samples

Outcomes reported

The study assessed how well Mehlich 3 soil nutrient concentrations correspond to grain nutrient concentrations across five cereal crops (maize, rice, sorghum, teff, wheat) in Ethiopia and Malawi. M3 test performance was evaluated against grain nutrient quality and compared with alternative soil extraction methods.

Theme
Measurement & metrics
Subject
Measurement methods & nutrient profiling
Study type
Research
Study design
Field trial / observational validation study
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Arable cereals
DOI
10.1016/j.fcr.2023.109243
Catalogue ID
SNmov5io1j-q8sm33

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.