Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewedConventional

Fruit, vegetable, and fiber intake in relation to cancer risk: findings from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)

Kathryn E. Bradbury, Paul N. Appleby, Timothy J. Key

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · 2014

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This observational analysis from the EPIC prospective cohort examined whether consumption of fruits, vegetables, and dietary fibre is associated with reduced cancer risk across multiple cancer types in a large European population. The study contributes to evidence on whether plant-based dietary components may have protective effects against cancer development, though observational designs cannot establish causation and residual confounding remains a concern.

Regional applicability

The EPIC cohort included participants from multiple European countries and thus provides relevant evidence for United Kingdom dietary epidemiology and cancer prevention policy, though UK participants were a subset of the overall population. Findings may inform UK public health guidance on fruit and vegetable intake, though UK-specific subgroup analyses would strengthen direct applicability.

Key measures

Dietary intake of fruits, vegetables, and fibre (likely assessed via food frequency questionnaire); cancer incidence by site and type

Outcomes reported

The study examined associations between dietary intake of fruits, vegetables, and fibre and incidence of various cancer types across the EPIC cohort.

Theme
Nutrition & health
Subject
Dietary patterns & chronic disease
Study type
Research
Study design
Observational cohort
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Europe
System type
Horticulture
DOI
10.3945/ajcn.113.071357
Catalogue ID
SNmqq4ljtf-t1d00y

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.