Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewedConventional

New energy development, land system transformation, and grain productivity quality: evidence from China

Yaqian Liu; Shenglin Ma; Xilin Zhang; Jiaxian Chen

Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · 2026

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This panel study of 30 Chinese provinces (2013–2022) constructs a multidimensional Grain Productivity Quality Index and uses difference-in-differences methods to estimate the causal effect of new energy development on grain production outcomes. A 1% increase in new energy development raises GPQI by 0.41%, with heterogeneous effects by energy source (solar and nuclear positive; hydropower and wind insignificant) and regional context. The findings suggest energy transition can support sustainable grain production, though effects vary substantially by institutional and governance conditions.

Regional applicability

This study is specific to China's energy and agricultural policy context, dual-carbon goals, and provincial-level governance structures. Findings may have limited direct applicability to United Kingdom farming systems, though the conceptual framework linking energy transition to food production resilience and the importance of regionally differentiated policy design could inform UK approaches to integrating renewable energy deployment with food security objectives.

Key measures

Grain Productivity Quality Index (GPQI) via entropy-weight method; new energy development intensity; provincial-level panel data (2013–2022); heterogeneity analysis by spatial, temporal, policy, economic and financial development levels

Outcomes reported

The study measured effects of new energy development on a multidimensional Grain Productivity Quality Index (GPQI) incorporating technological efficiency, digitalization, green-input adoption, production integration, and inclusiveness across Chinese provinces. Results showed heterogeneous impacts by energy type and regional context.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Research
Study design
Multi-period difference-in-differences with two-way fixed effects
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
China
System type
Arable cereals
DOI
10.3389/fsufs.2026.1765501
Catalogue ID
NRmu5d2itu-00v

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Ask about this record, its theme or its relevance to UK farming and policy. Pulse AI uses selected catalogue evidence and cites the sources it draws on.