Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewedConventional

CGSL Participation and Household Food Security Outcomes: A Difference-in-Differences Estimation in Three South Sudanese STATES

Makoi Majok Toch

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2026

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This retrospective difference-in-differences analysis examines whether participation in Community Group Saving and Lending (CGSL) mechanisms improves household food security in three rural South Sudanese states. Drawing on secondary analysis of 81 survey responses (53% CGSL members, 47% non-members) and 17 interviews, the study finds stronger improvements among CGSL members for food-security outcomes, agricultural productivity, technology adoption, and shock-coping capacity. The findings suggest that CGSLs facilitate improved food security through credit access, seasonal liquidity, savings discipline and collective risk management, though formal agricultural financing remains necessary for full food security.

Regional applicability

This study is specific to South Sudan's rural context and CGSL mechanisms operating in that region. The findings on community-based financial inclusion and agricultural credit access may have limited direct transferability to United Kingdom conditions, which have established formal financial systems and different agricultural structures, though the principles of credit access and technology adoption for agricultural productivity could be relevant to development programming in other post-conflict or low-income settings.

Key measures

Household food-security proxy, agricultural productivity indicators, market orientation, technology adoption, shock-coping capacity, credit access

Outcomes reported

The study measured associations between CGSL participation and household food-security outcomes, agricultural productivity, market orientation, technology adoption, and shock-coping capacity using difference-in-differences estimation.

Theme
Nutrition & health
Subject
Food security & global nutrition
Study type
Research
Study design
Difference-in-differences
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
South Sudan
System type
Mixed farming
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.22796363
Catalogue ID
NRmuwihsge-002

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Ask about this record, its theme or its relevance to UK farming and policy. Pulse AI uses selected catalogue evidence and cites the sources it draws on.