Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewed

Management of Coronary Artery Disease

Eric Sulava, J. C. Johnson

Surgical Clinics of North America · 2022

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This narrative review in Surgical Clinics of North America (2022) addresses current management approaches for coronary artery disease, encompassing both medical and surgical interventions. The paper appears to synthesise clinical evidence on treatment strategies and their outcomes in the management of this common cardiovascular condition. While the review is primarily clinical rather than nutrition-focused, it may address dietary and lifestyle factors as adjuncts to medical management.

Regional applicability

The findings are applicable to UK clinical practice, as coronary artery disease management protocols are broadly aligned across developed healthcare systems. However, the specific surgical and pharmaceutical options available may differ between the United States healthcare context and NHS provision.

Key measures

As suggested by the title, likely clinical outcomes such as symptom severity, functional capacity, procedural success rates, and disease recurrence or progression in coronary artery disease patients.

Outcomes reported

The paper likely reviews clinical management strategies for coronary artery disease, potentially including surgical interventions, medical therapies, and risk factor modification. Specific metrics would typically include procedural outcomes, symptom relief, and disease progression measures.

Theme
Nutrition & health
Subject
Dietary patterns & chronic disease
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
United States
System type
Human clinical
DOI
10.1016/j.suc.2022.01.005
Catalogue ID
SNmojg08fc-nq2rvg

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.