Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewed

Global Comparison of Erythrocyte EPA and DHA Concentrations in Pregnant Women

Tessa Deutsch, William S. Harris, Kristina Harris Jackson, Andreas Hahn, Jan Philipp Schuchardt

Journal of Nutrition · 2025

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This global synthesis of 66 observational studies and RCTs (2004–2025) involving 33,390 pregnant women from 28 countries reveals widespread insufficiency in maternal EPA+DHA status. Only three countries (Seychelles, Norway, Ghana) achieved desirable levels (>8%), whilst most developed nations including the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia fell into the insufficient range (4–6%), and several Asian countries demonstrated critically low levels (≤4%). The study standardised heterogeneous blood measurement methodologies to enable international comparison and underscores the need for pregnancy-specific reference ranges and targeted nutritional interventions.

Regional applicability

The United Kingdom is specifically identified as demonstrating insufficient/low eO3I levels (4–6%), indicating a maternal EPA+DHA deficiency gap despite being a developed nation. These findings suggest that UK maternal nutrition policy and clinical guidance may need to prioritise omega-3 PUFA supplementation or dietary strategies during pregnancy to meet fetal neurodevelopmental requirements.

Key measures

Estimated Omega-3 Index (eO3I) in red blood cells; maternal blood EPA+DHA concentrations; country-level mean eO3I levels classified into four categories (desirable >8%, sufficient/moderate 6-8%, insufficient/low 4-6%, very low/undesirable ≤4%)

Outcomes reported

The study assessed and compared maternal blood concentrations of EPA+DHA across 28 countries by standardising data from 66 studies involving 33,390 pregnant women, classifying countries into four categories based on estimated Omega-3 Index (eO3I) levels.

Theme
Nutrition & health
Subject
Maternal, infant & child nutrition
Study type
Systematic Review
Study design
Systematic review and meta-analysis
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Global
System type
Human clinical
DOI
10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.101299
Catalogue ID
SNmpyz6f9g-bm8unw

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.