Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewedConventional

Competition between autumn and spring planted grain intercrops of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and field bean (Vicia faba)

R Haymes, H.C Lee

Field Crops Research · 1999

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This field trial examined how the competitive balance between wheat and field bean changes depending on planting season (autumn versus spring), with implications for intercrop design and productivity. The research addresses whether autumn-sown systems—which establish winter-hardy wheat earlier—alter intercrop resource capture differently than spring-sown systems. Findings would inform choice of planting date to optimise yield and nitrogen cycling in grain–legume intercrops.

Regional applicability

Directly applicable to United Kingdom arable farming, where both autumn and spring planting windows are standard practice. The wheat–bean intercrop system is relevant to UK soil health and nitrogen fixation goals in regenerative and organic systems.

Key measures

Likely grain yield (wheat), pulse yield (field bean), land equivalent ratio (LER), total biomass, and/or aboveground dry matter by season and planting date

Outcomes reported

The study compared competitive interactions and yield performance between autumn- and spring-planted intercrop systems of wheat and field bean. Outcomes likely included grain and pulse yields, land equivalent ratio, and resource use efficiency between planting seasons.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Arable cropping systems
Study type
Research
Study design
Field trial
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
United Kingdom
System type
Mixed farming
DOI
10.1016/s0378-4290(99)00016-7
Catalogue ID
SNmuc6wjvm-1anyfb

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Ask about this record, its theme or its relevance to UK farming and policy. Pulse AI uses selected catalogue evidence and cites the sources it draws on.