Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewedSupporting researchConventional

Shotgun metagenomics, from sampling to analysis

Christopher Quince, Alan W. Walker, Jared T. Simpson, Nicholas James Loman, Nicola Segata

Nature Biotechnology · 2017

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This Nature Biotechnology review synthesises shotgun metagenomics as a transformative approach to characterise unculturable microbial communities in complex environmental and health-related samples. The authors examine computational strategies for both assembly and mapping-based profiling, highlighting remaining challenges in high-complexity samples and organisms with limited genomic reference data, whilst noting potential biotechnological applications in therapeutics and strain-level characterisation.

Regional applicability

As a methodological review without geographic specificity, the shotgun metagenomics frameworks discussed are applicable globally, including to United Kingdom research on soil, gut, and environmental microbiomes. Uptake and application depend on local laboratory capacity and computational infrastructure.

Key measures

Sequencing technologies, computational pipelines for assembly and mapping, microbial community composition and function

Outcomes reported

The paper reviews shotgun metagenomics approaches for characterising diverse microbial communities in environmental and human health contexts. It discusses assembly-based and mapping-based profiling methods and their computational challenges.

Supporting research

Corrected Nature review abstract outlines shotgun-metagenomics sampling/analysis methods. An exact primary2023 soil-metagenome study cites this review as the assembly/binning methodological source and applies the workflow to forest soil, documenting an external soil-method link.

Limits: Original review body behind subscription; its abstract, corrected change history and external soil application were reviewed. Corrigendum8December2017 restores financial interests and publication date12September2017; it is not a retraction. No soil outcome or full methodological certification.

Theme
Measurement & metrics
Subject
Soil biology & microbiology
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
System type
Laboratory / in vitro
DOI
10.1038/nbt.3935
Catalogue ID
SNmutc6m2l-0b9svs

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Ask about this record, its theme or its relevance to UK farming and policy. Pulse AI uses selected catalogue evidence and cites the sources it draws on.