Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewed

Amazon forest response to repeated droughts

Ted R. Feldpausch, Oliver Lawrence Phillips, Roel Brienen, Emanuel U. Gloor, Jon Lloyd, Gabriela López‐González, Abel Monteagudo‐Mendoza, Yadvinder Singh Malhi, Alejandro Alarcón, E. Álvarez Dávila, P. Alvarez‐Loayza, Ana Andrade, Luiz E. O. C. Aragão, Luzmila Arroyo, G. A. Aymard C., Timothy R. Baker, Christopher Baraloto, Jorcely Barroso, Damien Bonal, Wendeson Castro, Víctor Chama, Jérôme Chave, Tomas Ferreira Domingues, Sophie Fauset, Nikée Groot, Eurídice N. Honorio Coronado, Susan G. W. Laurance, W. F. Laurance, Simon L. Lewis, Juan Carlos Licona, Beatriz Schwantes Marimon, Ben Hur Marimon-Junior, Casimero Mendoza Bautista, David Neill, Edmar Almeida de Oliveira, Cristiano Santos, Nadir Pallqui Camacho, G. Pardo‐Molina, Adriana Prieto, Carlos Alberto Quesada, Fredy Ramírez, Hirma Ramírez‐Angulo, Maxime Réjou‐Méchain, A. Rudas, Gustavo Saiz, Rafael P. Salomão, Javier E. Silva‐Espejo, Marcos Silveira, Hans ter Steege, Juliana Stropp, John Terborgh, Raquel Thomas‐Caesar, Geertje M. F. van der Heijden, R. Vásquez Martínez, Emilio Vilanova, Vincent Antoine Vos

Global Biogeochemical Cycles · 2016

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

Using an extensive network of forest plots across the Amazon Basin, this study quantified the impact of the 2010 drought on forest dynamics by measuring mortality, growth, and biomass changes. The drought reversed the pre-2010 baseline biomass sink (1.33 Mg ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹) to a net loss of 1.95 Mg ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹, driven primarily by increased mortality and reduced productivity. Surprisingly, tree mortality was unrelated to local precipitation anomalies and prior drought history, whilst productivity declines were systematically related to the strength of moisture deficit, and the 2010 drought rendered Amazonian forests carbon neutral rather than a carbon sink.

Regional applicability

This study focuses on tropical forest dynamics in the Amazon Basin and does not directly apply to United Kingdom farming or forestry systems. However, the findings on forest resilience to repeated droughts and the potential loss of carbon sequestration capacity under climate stress may inform UK policy discussions on natural climate solutions and long-term carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems.

Key measures

Net biomass change (Mg ha⁻¹), biomass mortality rate (Mg ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹), biomass productivity (Mg ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹), tree growth rates, precipitation anomalies, carbon flux (Pg C yr⁻¹)

Outcomes reported

The study measured forest biomass changes, mortality rates, and productivity during the 2010 drought using ground-based forest plot observations across the Amazon Basin. The 2010 drought caused a net biomass loss of 0.43 Mg ha⁻¹, driven by increased tree mortality (1.45 Mg ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹) and reduced productivity (−0.50 Mg ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹), resulting in Amazon forests being carbon neutral rather than a carbon sink.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Research
Study design
Field trial / Observational cohort
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Brazil
System type
Other
DOI
10.1002/2015gb005133
Catalogue ID
BFmucmwxjd-vsdh1f

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.