Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 2 — RCT, large cohort or strong causal designPeer-reviewed

Ultra-processed diets cause excess calorie intake and weight gain: An inpatient randomized controlled trial of Ad Libitum food intake

Hall, K. D., et al

Cell Metabolism · 2019

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This inpatient randomised controlled trial demonstrated that ad libitum consumption of ultra-processed foods resulted in 508 kcal/day greater energy intake compared to matched unprocessed diets, driven by increased carbohydrate and fat consumption. Participants gained 0.8 kg during the ultra-processed diet phase and lost 1.1 kg during the unprocessed diet phase, with weight changes strongly correlated with energy intake (r=0.8). The findings suggest that ultra-processed food formulation—independent of macronutrient or basic nutrient composition—promotes overconsumption and may be a tractable target for obesity prevention.

Regional applicability

Whilst conducted in the United States, the mechanistic findings regarding ultra-processed food design and energy intake regulation are likely applicable to United Kingdom consumers, as ultra-processed foods share similar formulations across Western markets. UK policy and public health guidance on food processing and obesity prevention could draw on this evidence base.

Key measures

Daily energy intake (kcal/d), macronutrient intake (carbohydrate, fat, protein in kcal/d), body weight change (kg), correlation between energy intake and weight change (r)

Outcomes reported

The study measured ad libitum energy intake, macronutrient consumption, and body weight changes when 20 weight-stable adults consumed either ultra-processed or unprocessed diets for 2-week periods in a controlled inpatient setting. Meals were matched for presented calories, energy density, macronutrients, sugar, sodium, and fibre.

Theme
Nutrition & health
Subject
Dietary patterns & chronic disease
Study type
Research
Study design
RCT
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
United States
System type
Human clinical
DOI
10.1016/j.cmet.2020.08.014
Catalogue ID
IRmqh58doj-477974

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Ask about this record, its theme or its relevance to UK farming and policy. Pulse AI uses selected catalogue evidence and cites the sources it draws on.