Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewPeer-reviewedConventional

Red and processed meat and colorectal cancer incidence: Metaanalysis of prospective studies

Chan, D. S., et al

PLoS One · 2011

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies quantified the association between red and processed meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk. High intake of red and processed meat was associated with a 22% increased risk of colorectal cancer (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.11–1.34), with a dose-response relationship plateauing at approximately 140 g/day. Separate analyses identified increased risk for both fresh red meat (RR 1.17 per 100 g/day) and processed meat (RR 1.18 per 50 g/day), with stronger associations for colon than rectal cancer.

Regional applicability

These findings are internationally applicable, including to United Kingdom dietary patterns and public health policy. The study supports evidence-based dietary guidance on limiting red and processed meat consumption, consistent with UK recommendations from the National Health Service and food-based dietary guidelines.

Key measures

Summary relative risk (RR) for colorectal cancer; dose-response relationship per 100 g/day increase in red meat and per 50 g/day increase in processed meat; non-linear dose-response curve; stratified analysis by colon and rectal cancer

Outcomes reported

The meta-analysis pooled relative risks from prospective studies to quantify the association between red and processed meat intake and colorectal cancer incidence. Non-linear dose-response relationships were explored to determine threshold effects.

Theme
Nutrition & health
Subject
Dietary patterns & chronic disease
Study type
Meta-analysis
Study design
Meta-analysis
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Intensive livestock
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0020456
Catalogue ID
IRmqh58doj-85bb78

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Ask about this record, its theme or its relevance to UK farming and policy. Pulse AI uses selected catalogue evidence and cites the sources it draws on.