Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryIndustry / policy reportConventional

Safety evaluation of a food enzyme containing cellulase and endo-1,3(4)-β-glucanase activities from the non-genetically modified Trichoderma reesei strain DP-Nzc104.

EFSA Panel on Food Enzymes (FEZ), Zorn H, Barat Baviera JM, Bolognesi C, Catania F, Gadermaier G, Greiner R, Mayo B, Mortensen A, Roos YH, Solano MLM, Van Loveren H, Vernis L, Andreoli C, Terron A, Yurkov A, Criado A, Cavanna D, Aguilera J, Andryszkiewicz M, Liu Y.

EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

The EFSA Panel on Food Enzymes evaluated the safety of a cellulase and endo-1,3(4)-β-glucanase enzyme preparation produced from non-genetically modified Trichoderma reesei for use in six food manufacturing processes. Genotoxicity testing showed no safety concern, and a 90-day rat study established a no observed adverse effect level of 1000 mg TOS/kg bw per day, yielding a margin of exposure of at least 1664 relative to estimated dietary exposure. Whilst sequence homology searches identified matches to known food and respiratory allergens, the Panel concluded the enzyme does not raise safety concerns under the intended conditions of use, though allergic reactions upon dietary exposure cannot be entirely excluded.

Regional applicability

This is a European Food Safety Authority safety assessment applied across European populations. The findings and approved conditions of use are directly applicable to United Kingdom food manufacturing and regulatory compliance, though post-Brexit, UK food law implementation may require separate national consideration.

Key measures

Estimated dietary exposure (0.601 mg TOS/kg body weight per day), no observed adverse effect level (1000 mg TOS/kg bw per day), margin of exposure (≥1664), genotoxicity test results, allergen sequence homology matches

Outcomes reported

Safety assessment of a cellulase and endo-1,3(4)-β-glucanase enzyme preparation for use in food manufacturing, including genotoxicity, systemic toxicity, and allergenicity evaluations. Dietary exposure was estimated and compared against toxicological findings.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Food & agricultural policy
Study type
Policy
Study design
Policy report
Source type
Industry/policy report
Status
Published
Geography
Europe
System type
Food supply chain
DOI
10.2903/j.efsa.2026.10339
Catalogue ID
NRmvfswp5v-003

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Ask about this record, its theme or its relevance to UK farming and policy. Pulse AI uses selected catalogue evidence and cites the sources it draws on.