Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryBook chapter

Self-Efficacy Interventions

Lisa M. Warner, David French

Cambridge University Press eBooks · 2020

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This chapter reviews primary and meta-analytic research on how self-efficacy—individuals' beliefs in their capability to implement behaviour needed to reach goals—can be promoted through structured behaviour change interventions. The authors examine the four main sources of self-efficacy and synthesise evidence on techniques that activate these sources across health, work, and academic domains. The review provides practical guidance for designing and evaluating interventions targeting self-efficacy as a mechanism for sustained behaviour change.

Regional applicability

This is a generic psychology and behaviour change review with no specific geographic focus. Findings on self-efficacy mechanisms and intervention design are broadly transferable to United Kingdom health, occupational, and educational contexts, though the review does not address food systems, agriculture, or nutrition specifically.

Key measures

Self-efficacy beliefs; sources of self-efficacy (mastery experiences, vicarious experiences, verbal persuasion, somatic and affective states); behaviour change outcomes

Outcomes reported

The chapter reviews empirical and meta-analytic research on behaviour change techniques that promote self-efficacy beliefs. It synthesises evidence across health, work, and academic intervention contexts and provides practical guidelines for designing and evaluating such interventions.

Theme
General food systems / other
Subject
Out of scope / non-food
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Book chapter
Status
Published
System type
Other
DOI
10.1017/9781108677318.032
Catalogue ID
SNmqopf68x-p7kqfx

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Pulse AI has read the whole catalogue. Ask about this record, its theme, or how the findings apply to UK farming and policy — every answer cites the underlying studies.