Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 1 — Meta-analysis / systematic reviewIndustry / policy report

EMA and EFSA Joint Scientific Opinion on measures to reduce the need to use antimicrobial agents in animal husbandry in the European Union, and the resulting impacts on food safety (RONAFA)

David J. Murphy, Antonia Ricci, Zanda Auce, J. Gabriel Beechinor, Hanne Bergendahl, Rory Breathnach, Jiří Bureš, João Pedro Duarte Da Silva, Judita Hederová, P. Hekman, Cornelia Ibrahim, Emil Kozhuharov, Gábor Kulcsár, Eva Lander Persson, Johann M. Lenhardsson, Petras Mačiulskis, Ioannis Malemis, Ljiljana Markus‐Cizelj, Alia Michaelidou‐Patsia, Martti Nevalainen, Paolo Pasquali, Jean‐Claude Rouby, Johan Schefferlie, Wilhelm Schlumbohm, M. Schmit, Stephen C. Spiteri, Stanko Srčič, Lollita Taban, Toomas Tiirats, Bruno Urbain, Ellen‐Margrethe Vestergaard, Anna Wachnik‐Święcicka, Jason M. Weeks, Barbara Zemann, Ana Allende, Declan Bolton, Marianne Chemaly, Pablo Salvador Fernández Escámez, Rosina Gironés, Lieve Herman, Kostas Koutsoumanis, Roland Lindqvist, Birgit Nørrung, Lucy J. Robertson, Giuseppe Ru, Moez Sanaa, Marion Simmons, Panagiotis Skandamis, Emma Snary, Niko Speybroeck, Benno Ter Kuile, Helene Wahlström, Keith E. Baptiste, Boudewijn Catry, Pier Sandro Cocconcelli, Robert Davies, Christian Ducrot, Christian Friis, Gregers Jungersen, Simon J. More, Cristina Muñoz Madero, Pascal Sandérs, Marian E. H. Bos, Zoltan Kunsagi, Jordi Torren Edo, Rosella Brozzi, Candiani Denise, Beatriz Guerra, E. Liébana, Pietro Stella, John Threlfall, Helen Jukes

EFSA Journal · 2017

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This joint EFSA–EMA scientific opinion provides a comprehensive assessment of antimicrobial reduction strategies across the European Union's food-producing animal sector. The authors document that whilst individual measures' impacts are difficult to isolate due to multiple confounding factors, evidence supports an association between reduced antimicrobial use and decreased AMR. The opinion recommends a multifaceted approach combining national strategies, improved surveillance, veterinary governance, enhanced disease prevention through husbandry improvements, and development of alternative interventions such as probiotics and bacteriophages.

Regional applicability

The findings and recommendations are directly applicable to United Kingdom practice, as this assessment was conducted under the EU regulatory framework in which the UK participated at the time of publication. The recommended governance structures, monitoring systems, and disease prevention approaches remain relevant to current UK animal health policy, though post-Brexit implementation may require adapted legislative mechanisms.

Key measures

Antimicrobial use reduction; antimicrobial resistance prevalence; implementation of national reduction targets; benchmarking systems; prescribing controls; adoption of alternatives (probiotics, prebiotics, bacteriophages, organic acids)

Outcomes reported

The paper reviews EU-wide measures implemented to reduce antimicrobial use in food-producing animals and evaluates their impact on antimicrobial resistance (AMR). It identifies successful reduction strategies across Member States and recommends a multifaceted integrated approach including national targets, monitoring systems, veterinary oversight, disease prevention, and alternative products.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Antimicrobial resistance
Study type
Systematic Review
Study design
Systematic review / Policy assessment
Source type
Policy report
Status
Published
Geography
Europe
System type
Intensive livestock
DOI
10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4666
Catalogue ID
SNmqrjwl98-cyx7go

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Ask about this record, its theme or its relevance to UK farming and policy. Pulse AI uses selected catalogue evidence and cites the sources it draws on.