Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewedConventional

Productivity, biodiversity trade-offs, and farm income in an agroforestry versus an arable system

Tom Staton, Tom D. Breeze, Richard John Walters, Jo Smith, Robbie D. Girling

Ecological Economics · 2021

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This study evaluated an agroforestry system integrating apples with arable crops using primary field data combined with ecosystem service and financial modelling. Although arable yields declined by up to 11% in agroforestry, projected gross mixed income was higher in 15 of 18 scenarios over 20 years, with carbon sequestration payments potentially covering 47–88% of establishment costs. The findings suggest diversified farming can improve farm profitability where carbon finance is available, though initial financial barriers would benefit from grant support.

Regional applicability

This research was conducted in the United Kingdom and directly applies to UK farming conditions, policy context, and practice. The findings are particularly relevant to UK farmers considering diversification under emerging environmental land management schemes (such as Defra's Sustainable Farming Incentive) that offer payments for ecosystem services including carbon sequestration.

Key measures

Arable crop yields (% reduction), apple seed set (pollination proxy), apple yields, weed cover, carbon sequestration, gross mixed income projections (20-year), establishment costs, carbon payment contribution

Outcomes reported

The study compared arable yields, apple productivity, pollination services, carbon sequestration, and projected farm income over 20 years between an integrated apple-arable agroforestry system and conventional arable monoculture. Financial projections modelled gross mixed income and the contribution of carbon payments to establishment costs.

Theme
Farming systems, soils & land use
Subject
Agroforestry & intercropping
Study type
Research
Study design
Field trial with ecosystem service modelling and cost-benefit analysis
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
United Kingdom
System type
Agroforestry
DOI
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107214
Catalogue ID
SNmuw73h6l-7xibye

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Ask about this record, its theme or its relevance to UK farming and policy. Pulse AI uses selected catalogue evidence and cites the sources it draws on.