Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewedConventional

Methods to address poultry robustness and welfare issues through breeding and associated ethical considerations

William M. Muir, H.W. Cheng, Candace Croney

Frontiers in Genetics · 2014

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This narrative review examines how contemporary selective breeding programmes, informed by genomics and quantitative genetic theory, can address poultry welfare concerns in intensive production systems. The authors highlight that indirect genetic effects (IGEs), multi-level selection, and kin selection show promise in reducing mortality, eliminating cannibalism and aggressive pecking, and improving robustness—the ability of birds to cope with environmental stressors—whilst maintaining or increasing productivity. The review situates these breeding advances within evolving ethical expectations and regulatory pressures for improved housing and management.

Regional applicability

This paper addresses methodological and genetic approaches applicable across intensive poultry production systems globally, including the United Kingdom. The emphasis on reducing beak trimming and improving welfare through breeding is directly relevant to UK poultry producers facing regulatory pressure and consumer demand for higher welfare standards, though specific implementation would depend on UK breeding stock genetics and regulatory frameworks.

Key measures

Mortality rates, productivity, pecking and cannibalism incidence, beak trimming necessity, robustness (stress-coping ability), leg score, bone strength, disease resistance, and welfare indicators.

Outcomes reported

The study examines how selective breeding programmes, enhanced by genomics and quantitative genetic theory, can improve poultry adaptation to production environments and welfare outcomes. It evaluates methods including genomic selection, indirect genetic effects (IGEs), multi-level selection, and kin selection for reducing mortality, cannibalism, pecking behaviour, and the need for beak trimming whilst maintaining productivity.

Theme
Nutrition & health
Subject
Animal health & welfare
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
System type
Poultry
DOI
10.3389/fgene.2014.00407
Catalogue ID
SNmv4rsuyn-wkyhu3

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Ask about this record, its theme or its relevance to UK farming and policy. Pulse AI uses selected catalogue evidence and cites the sources it draws on.