Can farming improve what people eat?
Yes, when the whole chain is built and measured. From the mid-1980s Finland added selenium to farm fertilisers, and selenium intakes and blood levels rose substantially. Orange-fleshed sweet potato, rich in beta-carotene, raised vitamin A intakes in Mozambique and Uganda. Convincing cases measure more than one link and use a design that fits the question.
Last time's quick check: food tables from different decades differ in variety, place, laboratory and method all at once, so a fall in the numbers can't be pinned on any one of them. Finland's soils are naturally low in selenium, a trace element people need in small amounts.
In the 1980s the Finnish government decided to add selenium to the multi-nutrient fertilisers used on farms across the country, starting in the middle of the decade. Through the crops, the grass, the animals and the milk, selenium reached people's plates. Within a few years, selenium intakes and the levels in people's blood rose substantially, and the dose in the fertiliser was adjusted over the years as the monitoring came in.
It's a before-and-after with no comparison country, the design Module 3 warned about. Why trust it? Because every link in the chain was measured: selenium in the fertiliser, the crops, the foods, the diet and the blood, year after year. When each link moves, in the right order, the chain holds.
Biofortification means growing more of a nutrient into the crop itself, by breeding or by fertilising. Finland's selenium was one kind. Another is orange-fleshed sweet potato, rich in beta-carotene, which the body turns into vitamin A. It was bred and promoted in parts of Africa where vitamin A deficiency is common.
In studies in Mozambique and Uganda, families given the vines and nutrition advice ate more vitamin A, including their young children. Remember the beta-carotene pills from Module 3 that did harm? Different people, a different dose, a different form. A food that fills a deficiency is not a high-dose pill given to people who already have enough.
Lind's question again: what exactly is "it"? And remember the Kenya trial: farm support plus food, nutrition and hygiene support improved children's growth more than farm support alone. Growing more doesn't guarantee eating better. And from Module 1, a crop is only as nourishing as the way it's processed and cooked.
The cases that convince share three things. A clear mechanism at every link. Measurements at more than one link, not just the start and the end. And a design that fits the question: a national programme followed for years, or trials where families could be randomised. That's the standard any claim about farming and nutrition should meet. Next: back to the wheat farm, from a pattern to a plan.
Because every link in the chain was measured: selenium in the fertiliser, the crops, the foods, the diet and the blood, year after year. When each link moves, in the right order, the chain holds. The dose in the fertiliser was also adjusted over the years as the monitoring came in.
Growing more of a nutrient into the crop itself, by breeding or by fertilising. Finland’s selenium fertiliser was one kind. Orange-fleshed sweet potato, rich in beta-carotene, which the body turns into vitamin A, was bred and promoted in parts of Africa where vitamin A deficiency is common.
Causal evidence is changing how farming is measured and rewarded. Leave your email and we will tell you when new films, courses and findings are published.
Prefer to read online? Vitagri also writes on Substack. See our privacy policy for how we use your email.