Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 4 — Narrative / commentaryPeer-reviewedConventional

Coping Strategies in Livestock-dependent Households in East and Southern Africa: A Synthesis of Four Case Studies

Philip K. Thornton, Randall B. Boone, Kathleen A. Galvin, Shauna B. BurnSilver, Michael Waithaka, Joan Kuyiah, Stanley Karanja Ng’ang’a, Ernesto Gonzalez‐Estrada, Mario Herrero

Human Ecology · 2007

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This synthesis examines how livestock-dependent households in East and Southern Africa manage livelihood shocks and stressors through various coping mechanisms. By integrating evidence from four geographically and ecologically distinct case studies, the work likely identifies common and context-specific adaptive strategies, contributing to understanding of household resilience in pastoral and mixed farming systems. The study appears positioned at the intersection of human ecology, pastoral livelihoods, and food security in variable African environments.

Regional applicability

This study focuses on East and Southern African pastoral and agro-pastoral systems, which differ substantially from United Kingdom livestock farming in terms of scale, market integration, climate variability, and resource access. Findings on coping strategy typologies and household decision-making may offer comparative insights for understanding adaptive capacity in contrasting farming systems, though direct policy or practice transfer to UK conditions is limited.

Key measures

Coping strategy types, household livelihood outcomes, adaptive capacity indicators across pastoral and agro-pastoral systems

Outcomes reported

The study synthesises coping strategies employed by livestock-dependent households across four case studies in East and Southern Africa in response to livelihood pressures and environmental variability. Analysis likely characterises household-level adaptive responses and their effectiveness across different socio-ecological contexts.

Theme
Policy, governance & rights
Subject
Food & farming system resilience
Study type
Narrative Review
Study design
Narrative review / Cross-case synthesis
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
International
System type
Pasture-based livestock
DOI
10.1007/s10745-007-9118-5
Catalogue ID
SNmv1wva19-gvfubh

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Ask about this record, its theme or its relevance to UK farming and policy. Pulse AI uses selected catalogue evidence and cites the sources it draws on.