Pulse Brain · Growing Health Evidence Index
Tier 3 — Observational / field trialPeer-reviewedRegenerative

On-farm adoption and impacts of climate-smart agricultural practices on food security of smallholder farmers in Mali

Abel-Gautier Kouakou; A. Tofa; Dioukou Sissoko; M. Coulibaly; A. Kamara; T. Abdoulaye

Food Security · 2026

Read source ↗ All evidence

Summary

This study examines the adoption patterns and food security impacts of five climate-smart agricultural practices (minimum tillage, sowing date adjustment, climate-smart varieties, crop diversification, and tree planting) among smallholder farmers across Mali's agroecological zones. Using econometric modelling, the authors find that minimum tillage substantially reduces food insecurity in cereal-producing households, whilst all five practices improve dietary diversity—though adoption varies significantly by zone and crop type. The research identifies extension access and household size as key determinants of CSA uptake, with implications for targeting support in resource-limited settings.

Regional applicability

The findings relate to sub-Saharan African smallholder farming systems rather than United Kingdom agriculture, which operates in a distinct temperate climate with different institutional and market structures. However, the methodological approach to measuring CSA adoption and food security impacts may inform evaluation frameworks for climate adaptation programmes in other lower-income agricultural regions.

Key measures

CSA practice adoption rates by agroecological zone and crop type; household food insecurity scores; dietary diversity scores

Outcomes reported

The study measured adoption rates of five CSA practices across agroecological zones and their impacts on household food insecurity and dietary diversity. Minimum tillage reduced cereal-producing household food insecurity by 94%, whilst all five practices improved dietary diversity scores.

Theme
Climate & resilience
Subject
Climate & greenhouse gas mitigation
Study type
Research
Study design
Observational cohort with Multinomial Endogenous Treatment Effect model
Source type
Peer-reviewed study
Status
Published
Geography
Mali
System type
Mixed farming
DOI
10.1007/s12571-026-01681-6
Catalogue ID
NRmupdc5m3-0b4

Topic tags

Pulse AI · ask about this record

Dig deeper with Pulse AI.

Ask about this record, its theme or its relevance to UK farming and policy. Pulse AI uses selected catalogue evidence and cites the sources it draws on.